Apparatus for fault location on electrical conductors.



H. M. FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION ON ELECTRICAL comauc'rons.

APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10, 1907.

1,057,817, Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

10 SHEETSSHEET 1.

v H D.

FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL CONDUGTORS.

I APPLIOA'I'ION FILED JUNE 10, 1907. 1,057,817, Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

"10 sums-$112M: 2.

HEPZQPZMFI ZendI Z0652 asses: I J

H. M. FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION ON ELECTRICAL OONDUOTORS.

APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10, 1907.

1,057,817, PatentedApr.1,1913.

1o SHEETS-SHEET a.

QQQMQQQQ WOW .QQCDCDQQ THOUSANDS HUNDREDS I TENS wiizasses: fivenibn M 1? 65mg M 0, 1 r

a J Z W H. M. FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LQGATION 0N ELECTRICAL OONDUGTORS.

APPLIOATION FILED JUNE 10, 1907.

3 Jn .5. P M Z 5 7w. .9 AW 6 7 7 v. 5 1 m 4 m 7, F 5 Z A 1 Z H. M. FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOGATION 0N ELECTRICAL GONDUCTORS.

APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10, 1907. 1,057,817, Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

10 SHEETS-SHEET 5.

gaining v I I n. M. FRIENDLY. APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL CONDUCTORS.

. APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10, 1907 1,057,817,, u Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

10 sinus-51mm a.

- .Ewgzf/Mfiez Z012 ne'sses: i zveni'ar? MW =7 I Q H. M. FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL OONDUGTORS.

APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10 1907.

1,057,817. Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

I B 10 SHEETS-SHEET 1. I

5 I Q a I m 9.15 2

jmiwgyi H'. M. FRIENDLY. APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL GONDUOTORS.

APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10, 1907.

1,057,817. Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

10 SHEETS-SHEET 8.

H. M. FRIENDLY.

APPARATUS POR'FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL GONDUGTORS.

Apr. 1, 1913.

EETS S BET 9.

Patented H. M. FRIENDLY. APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL GONDUGTORS. APPLICATION FILED JUNE 10, 14507.

1,057,817, Pa tnted Apr. 1, 1913.

10 sums-slum 10.

.arepmzjzz-mgg Z0652 asses ag 192235 L J'i L f E; W

Jiiorzze 5' HERBERT M, FRIENDLY, F PORTLAND, OREGON.

APPARATUS FOR FAULT LOCATION 0N ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOBS.

Specification of Letter: Patent.

Application filed June 10, 1907. Serial No. 878,196.

Patented Apr. 1, 1913.

To all whom it may concern:

Be it known that I, HERBERT M. FRIENDLY,

a citizen of the United States of America,

and a resident of Portland, county of Multnomah, and State of Oregon, have invented a new and useful Improvement in Apparatus for Fault Location on Electrical Con ductors, of which the following is a specification. My invention relates to that class of electrical testing devices intended for use in locating grounds or crosses on'electrical conductors in cables or on insulators, and involving the use of adjustable resistances and of a galvanometer or other current-detecting device.

It is well known to utilize adjustable resistances and galvanometers or other current detectors, in connection with sources of current for locating grounds and crosses upon lines; but in allthe methods which are available for use with apparatus of limited complication and reasonable scope, a certain amount of mathematical calculation is necessary after the manipulation of the instruments has been completed.

My invention enables fault locations to be made with a minimum of operations and calculations, rendering possible the formulation 80 of specific instructions which need but to be followed by a person of usual intelligence and limited special training to enable the results to be reached in terms commonly understood and not complex,

My invention is'illustrated in the accompanying drawings, in which,

Figure l is a diagram of a circuit representing a modified. Wheatstone bridge for.

determining the location of faults upon electrical conductors accordin to the process of myinvention described erein, two independent adjustable resistances being included in one of the bridge arms. Fig. 2 is a diagram of a similar equipment using a 'single adjustable resistance divided into units and capable of a plurality of successive adjustments. Fig. 3 is an apparatus and circuit diagram in amplification of the schematic diagram of Fig. 2, many details of the application of Fig. 2 to practice being shown in Fig. 3. Fig. 4 is a modification of Fig; 3, involving a pair of adjustable bridge arms designed for universal use as compared with the highly specialized but simpler bridge arm rheostats of Fig. 3. Fig. 5 1s a top plan showing knobs, pointer and dials of .of the device of Figs. 5 and 6.

a rotary adjustable resistance or rheosta't.

Fig. 6 is an elevation of the device of Fig. 5 with resistance coilsomitted. Fig. 7 is a plan view of the device of Fi 5 with knobs, pointer and dials removed. %i 8 is a section of the device of Fig. 5 on t e line A A. Fig. 9 is a bottom view of the device of Figs. 5 and 6, with only one three-point conducting link in place, the remaining links bein omitted for simplicity. Figs. 10, 11 and 12 show elevations of. three three-point conducting links. Fig. 13 is a circuit diagram Fi 14: shows the three conducting arcs foriiing contact members of the device of Figs. 5 and 6 for electrical connection with the upper portionof the rotary brush. Fig. 15 1s a plan of' tlie outer dial. Fig. 16 is a section of the dial of Fig. 15, broken away on the broken line BC. Fig. 17 is plan of the inner dial. Fi .118 is elevation of the inner dial. Fig. 19 1s plan of knobs, pointer and dials on a thirty-unit rotary rheostat. Fig. 20 is a circuit dia ram of the rheostat of Fig. 19-. Fig. 21 isplug-b'lock plan and circuit diagram of a rectllinear plug rheostat equipped with an adjustable auxiliary scale per my invention. Fig. 22 is plan of 'the adjustable auxiliary scale of Fig. 21.

Fig. 23 is an elevation of the scale, and, Fig. 2.4 is a section and view of the scale of Fig.

23 taken on the line'D-D. Fig. 25 is the, apparatus of Fig. 1, connected to a defective conductor and exhibits the conditions ofthe well-known Varley loop test. Fig. 26 is a garley loop test using the diagram of Throughout all the figures showing mechanical details the resistance coils have been omitted. My invent-ion is independent of specific detail of resistance beyond those fundamental principles of heat co-efiicient,

zero inductance, etc. desirable and usual in Wheatstone bridge devices. The resistances of course are shown inthe circuit diagrams, and terminal provisions for the connection of the resistances are shown in'the figures covering mechanical details.

It is assumed at the outset that the V3117 ous ordinary methods of testing for the value of an unknown resistance by the Wheatstone bridge principle are well vknown, and that that variation of the stood, as it 1s these methods which are by loop test'is also well undertele hone hnes.

onsidering thecase of a test to be made 1 to determine the location of a ground or cross upon one of two wires, one o the wires used the test being clear of any fault, these two wires bein joined at the distant end,it will easily, e seen that the ordinary Varleylooptest may be applied. In this case a calibrated resistance, such as 7, would be inserted in the conductor leading from one terminal of the galvanometer to the wire having the fault upon it. Then with the battery grounded at E so' as to supply current through the fault, this resistance may be adjusted until no deflection of the galvanometer occurs, under the general conditions shown in Fig. 25. The customary formula for the Varley loop test is:

bL or R- 0+? R bein the resistance in ohms from the point 0 testing to the fault f,-b and a, being the respective arms of the bridge in the general relation shown inthe figure, L being the total series resistance of the two wires under test, or, in other words, of the loop, and r being the resistance of the rheostat as varied to produce a condition of no deflection in the galvanometer.

The three distinct ste s, in the ordinary Varley loop test as er ormed on my apparatus may be un erstood by referring more particularly to the exact conditions shown in Fig. 25.

.Arranging the device of Fig. 1 in association with the defective conductor as indicated in Fig. 25, with the fault at f on one defective wire of the loop L, the loop L consisting of the defective wire connected at its distant, end to a good return wire, with a known ratio between the bridge arms a and b and with the resistance 1" adjusted to zero, the resistance r may be varied until no deflection of the galvanometer G occurs when the keys 27 and 32 are depressed. Under the conditions established, the test made will have been a simple Wheatstone bridge measurement of the resistance of the loop L, and this resistance is determined at once in standard units of resistance by multiplying adjusted calibrated resistance 1 b the previously established ratio of etc b.

owing the value thus determined and changing the switch K to connect'the battery B to' ground instead of to conductor '35, thus appl ing the batter through the ground E an the fault f, t e resistance 7' may be again adjusted to a balance. ,All

quantities in thesecond'member of the Varley loop flfilfltlOIl are now known, and the resistance from the testmg device over thus be etermm of the key cipal useful forms of testing ace-near the fatal wire the point of fault may The foregoing illustrates the a plication w 'c'h may be named the commutator of my invention to twoof the prin-- involving subsequent calculations, that is, to the measurement of resistances, as of the loop L, Fi 25, by the simple Wheatstone brid e metho and to the or inary pplication of the bridge to- Varley loop metho s. It is, however, to the arrangement of apparatus for a new rocess or method of measurement or of ault location that my invention is directed. In the Varley loop 'test, as ordinaril practiced, three steps are necessary: first, the etermination of t e loo'p resistance of the two wires under test; second, the balancing of the good wire in series with the remote portion of the faulty wire against a known variable resistance 1n series with the near v portion of the faulty wire, and third, the

substitution of the loop resistance determinedin the first step, and the resistance necessary to balance as determined in the second step, in the Varley loop equation already given, in order to solve for the resistance to the fault on the faulty wire.

In my improved method, made possible by my improved arrangement of apparatus, the loop resistance L is involved in the balancing of the resistance r, and the resistance r then is retained as a part of the circuitof the later test. The introduction of the result of the first test into the second test thus is made automatically, the necessity of any knowledge on the'part of the operator of the loop resistance or of the absolute value of the r resistance is obviated. This method may be understood from Fig. 25. With the arrangement as shown, but with the key K in its alternative position, supplying battery B through earth and the'fault f, and with r adjusted to zero, the resistance 1" may be adjusted to a balance of the galvanometer. For this adjustment I prefer aratio of a to I) such that a will be 1/9, 1/99, etc., of Z), the sum of a and 6 being always some power of ten when referred to a as base. When a balance has been reached, shift switch K to the position illustrated in Fig. 25, and, leaving r as adjusted, adjust 7 until a balance of the galvanometer is reached. Then the resistance in ohms to the fault is the resistance of res adjusted,

multiplied by the ratio of the arm a to'the sum of the arms a and b. That this is so is readily proven:

With the first measurement involving the battery circuit through earth and the fault, r being zero,

' a L-R Fara For the second adjustment, with the switch K in the position shown, leaving r as previously ad usted and arriving at a balance by the adjustment of 1',

- solving for R,

a R-r But with the values chosen the sum of aand b is always some power of ten when referred to a as a base; therefore,

a b f 10* and the value of R therefore becomes 10 and the calculation is simply to divide the value of 7- by the particular power of 10, or in other words to point oil' from the right of the adjusted value of 1 as many places as there are ciphers in the power, or units in the index of the power. v It will be seen that the operations here are exceedingly simple, and with the rerequisite bridge arm relations establishe no real calculations whatever are necessary.

It will be noticed that in the first adjustment to galvanometerzero by the use of resistance 7". something of the usual process of determining the value of the resistance a was accomplished, but in contradistinction from methods requiring an exact determination of the numerical value of the resistance 1", my method takes no account of the nominal numerical value of T but. only utilizes it in a way such that it finally disappears from the equation without its value having been definitely determined, leaving that determination in the circuits as a means to a final end, and not as an element of calculation. An alternative device, utilizing fundamentallythe same principle of measurement, is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 26, the bridge arrangement of Fig. 2 being adapted to the testing circuit in this instance. The arrangement is identical with that of Fig. 25, except that the adjustable resistance is ofv one integral rheostat instead of being in two separate adjustable resistances as in Fig. 25. The rheostat of Fig. 26, which may.

be designated as a whole as Q, is shown as two sets of resistances as typical of such devices wherein a succession of l0-ohm resistances is connected in series with a succession of l-ohm resistances and a movable terminal for each 'set of resistances being applied between any two resistance elements to include any desired amount of resistance in the circuit in which the device may be connected.

that both tens and units of the rheostat Q will be employed. Let the dot-tedterminals 36 37' represent the position of the flexible terminals of the rheostat with this adjustment, which corresponds to the adjustment of r in Fig. 25, and let the numerical value of this adjustment be indicated by the symbol g. The second step is made by changing the switch K to theposition illustrated and again adjusting the rheostat Q to a balance of the galvanometer. Necessarily the indication of the rheostat Q will be larger upon this second adjustment than upon the first adjustment. Let the solid terminals 3637 represent the positions of the flexible terminals of the rheostat Q at this second adjustment, which represents a resistance in the bridge arm equivalent to the combined resistances of 1' and 7" of Fig. .25; and let the numerical value of the total resistance as thus adjustedby the second step be represented' by the symbol g+q. It is evident therefore that q in the method of Fig. 26 is the exact equivalent of 1' in the method of F ig.' 25, and that the result in ohms to the fault may be determined by the same simple operation, viz., that of pointing off from the rightof the determined value of q as many places as there are ciphers in the power, or units in the index of the power, of ten in the ratio of a to a-l-b.

The process of Fig. 26 involves the subtraction of the resistance as first ad'usted from the resistance as later adjusted 1n the rheostat Q. I shall describe next, rheostat devices with adjustable scales whereby this subtraction may be made mechanically and without the necessity of determining the value of g, the value of q being read directly from the rheostat scale after the termination of the two required adjustment-s.

Figs. 5 to 18 inclusive show details and assembly of a rheostat having twenty-one positions of adjustment and having a resistance between its terminals varying by uniform steps from zero resistance to twenty times the resistance determined by one step. The rheostat construction is independent of the size of the resistance unit and may vary by ohm's from zero to twenty, by tens of ohms from zero to two hundred and by hundreds of ohms from zero to two tho-usand, etc. In further description of the device, a one-ohm step will be assumed for convenience in reference.

Upon a base-block 38 is mounted by pillars 39 a disk dial hereinafter called the fixed or outerdial. This fixed dial is numbered from zero to twenty inclusive in its twenty-one steps and may be of any desired in Figs. 15 and 16, Fig. 15 showing plan and I Fig. 16 section and partial elevation. It will.

' the dials is maintained by. the radial ribs 41' I doctor or insulator. It is shown in detail be noted thata groove, as at 40', is cut radially for each of the twenty-one indication positions of the dial 40, this groove being on a shelf 40" lying within and below the surface bearing the indicating figures. Within the fixed or outer dial 40 is. movable auxiliary inner dial 41 numbered 0' to'lO, the numbers corresponding angularly with'the numbers of the outer dial. Detailof this dial is shown in plan in Fig. 17 and in elevation in Fig. 18. The dial presents a thin edge which rests upon the shelf 40" of the outer dial 40, and angular registration of which engage the radial slots 40 in any position, of the inner dial wherein its scale units register angularly with scale units of the outer dial. The inner dial rests loosely within the outer dial'and may be turned by the knob 42 forming an integral art of the inner dial. The opening 42 in t e knob 42 afiords clearance between the inner dial and a central shaft.

The electrical details of the rheostat are as follows: Upon the base block 38, Fig. 6, are mounted a circle of conducting studs or buttons numbered 0' 1' 2 3 4', etc, .in Fig. 7, which shows a view of the base block and studs or buttons with the dials removed. These contact buttons are the upper ends of studs which pass through the base block and appear below it as soldered terminals 0" 1" 2", etc., being long from 0 to 6" inelusive and short from 7 to 20 inclusive,

except that N o. 14" terminal is long for thfe re attachment of an additional wire. By erence to the circuit diagram of Fig. 13 it will be seen that resistance coils of one-ohm each are connected between the terminals at position 0 and position 1, etc., to and including position 6, the terminals 0" to 6"" being long for this purpose, after which resistance coils are not connected directly and the terminals are short except at terminal 14" where the leading in wire 43 is rovided for by the long terminal at 14". he resistance coils are not shown in detail. Upon the under surface of the fixed scale 40, and insulated fromit by the insulating septum 44 are three conducting arcs, 45-,

46-47. These arcs respectively lie above cont-act buttons 0' to 6, 7' to 13', and 14' to 20; they are connected by-conducting studs 45-46'-47 to terminals below the base block connected for the adjustment-of the 7 :bhm resistances 48 and 48' and 6f the leadin in wire 49. Concentric with the dials ,t ere is mounted in the base block the revolving shaft 50 carrying knob 51, pointer 52 and double brush 53. The brush '53 has upper and lower contact fingers Which'make contact simultaneously with the surface of the conducting buttons 0' 1' 2', etc. to 20', and with the conducting arcs 45-46-47 thus in each of the proper dial ositions oi adjustment connectin ing'buttons to one o the conducting arcs and thus (by reference to Fig. 13) connect? ing together the leading in wires 43-49 throng one or more ,of the resistance elements. The electrical circuits are completed bya set of three-point conducting links, one of which is shown in plan at 54 in Fi 9, connecting terminals 0 7" 14" and t me of which are shown in elevation in- Figs. 10-11 and 12. Seven such links are required, the first a flat one per Fig. 10 connecting say terminals 1" 8" 15"; the second one per Fig. 11 connecting another set of three terminals, but by reason of its raised center maintainin an insulating dis tance from the fiat link rst installed. Sucone of t e conduct the links formerly installed, the shape of one of the later links being shown in ele-' vation in Fig. 12. These links appear in Fig. 13 as radial conducting lines connected by circular conducting lines, the radial lines passing to the respective conducting buttons at positions 0, 7, 14; 1, 8, 15; 2, 9, 16; etc.

The brush 53 is controlled by a knob-51 acting through the shaft 50, and the position of the brush is indicated by the position of the pointer 52, the pointer 52 indicating upon the scale 40 the amount of resistance which in that position of adjustment the brush 53 permits to be included between the leading in wires 43 and 49.

The inclusion of a resistance varyin from zero to 20 ohms couldbe eifected by tie use of twenty resistance coils of l-ohm each connected all around from 0 to 20, the arcs 45-46-47 then being a continuous conductor connected to leading in Wire 49. I produce a cheaper method of manufacture by using only eight resistance coils, six of which are 1-ohm each and two of which are 7-ohms each. The circuit through Fi 13 may be traced as follows :-With brus 53 in zero position, from wire 43 through terminal at 14, link 54, terminal at 0,,brush 53, are 45 to wire 49. With brush 53 .in position 1, from wire 43 through terminal at 14, link 54, terminal at 0, first resistance of l ohm, terminal at 1, brush 53, are 45 to wire 49. With brush 53 in position 7, from wire 43, through terminal at 14 link 54, terminal at 7,

rush 53, are 46, 7-ohm resistance coil 48 to wire 49. With brush 53 in position 8, from wire 43, through terminal at 14, link 54, terminal at 0, first l-ohm resistance coil, terminal at 1, link 55, terminal at 8, brush 53, are 46, 7-ohm resistance coil 48 to 'wire' 49, including 8 ohms in the circuit. With brush 53 in position 15, from wire 43 through terminal at 14, link 54, terminal at 0, first l-ohm reand the same equations hold good.

decimal point 1 sistance coil, terminal at 1,- link 55, terminal at 1 5, brush '53, are 47, 7-ohm resistance .coil 48, are 46, 7-ohm resistance coil 48 to wire 49-, including 15 ohms in the circuit.

It, will be understood thus that by division of the total steps into any number of parts, and by proper multiple-point link connectors with a limited number of unit resistances and a proper number of auxiliary resistances of required size the system hereinset forth is capable of diversified a plication, of which the device chosen for i ustration in Figs. 5 to 18 inclusive is a specific instance. The same fundamental principle of resistance manipulation is exhibited in another specific instance in the circuit diagram of Fig. 20, and in a different mechanical type of rheostat in Fig. 21.

In use a plurality of rheostat units are connected in series with decimal relation between the resistances of each rheostat and its adjacent rheostat or rheostats, as indicated in Fig. 3.

Each dialhas an adjustment of one unit to 20 units. The first adjustment would be made by revolving the contact arms by means of the top handles until a state of balance is reached. To this point the operation is the same as in any Wheatstone bri%ge e movable dial in each decade is then turned until its zero is opposite the indicating pointer for the contact arm. The movable I 4 is automatically taken care of, since after dials are left as now adjusted andthe resistance is readjusted, starting with the decade on the left and not returning the pointers to their original Os. This establishes a new zero, as it were, the value as read from the movable dials after taking the second balance is the difference between the value of the first reading and the actual value of the second reading. Before taking the second reading the battery switch is turned to change the grounded pole of the battery from ground to the instrument terminal of the faulty wire, as in an ordinary loop or' resistance reading, or as in taking the second reading as described with re erence to' Fig. 25. .It will be observed that the value as read from the movable dial will be numerically the same as the value found for r in the second reading, per. Fig. 25, and the laced 1n the same manner as in the case of ig. 25.

- It is a fact that in the first balance (with battery grounded), the resistance inserted is less than when the second balance is completed. This value mi ht under certain 'condit-ions (if the fault is at the terminal of the instrument, and a reverse test were being made), be-equal, but not greater. This would mean that the arms would always be dial. 'far as 9 in the first measurement, and since placed rad-ia in the particular decade, which would complicate the result. As an example,say the first re'adin was actually 6856, the second actually 895 in all decades are as large or larger than in the former, which would show 2101 on the-movable dial, being the difference between the first and secondreadings. Had the second reading been 8934, the tens and units dials would have negative values, though the latter as a whole number is greater. It is this condition which makes it necessary to have at least 19 units in each decade (excepting possibly the first, or left).

In making-an ordinary arithmetical subtraction, when a certain decade in the number' to be.s ubtracted is greater than the number from which it is to be subtracted,

we must borrow one from the next higher decade. This will reduce the higher decade by one unit, which unit is equal to ten of the former decade. This will reduce the higher decade 4 one, and it must be so considered when s tracting from it in thenext operation.

It will be observed that the above point the arm passes 9 on the outer scale, it causes the readlng to be one short-in the preceding The contact arm may go around as the first setting is taken as a new zero in making the second reading, the contact arm could pass on to 18.

A further application would be to give the dial rheostat .31 contacts, instead of 21 as shown in Fig. 19, and use itthus:Assum-' ing a case Where the nearer end of the con- 'ductor to be tested is some distance from the testing apparatus, a connecting or leading in wire will be required to join the testing apparatus and the conductor to be tested. Suppose a reading is to be made through such a leading-in wire, on account of the near end of the conductor under test being some distance from the instrument.

The leading in wire to be connected to the faulty wire canbe grounded, after loopin same with the other leading-in wire, an the feetequivalent (or other unit equivalent), or the ohms to the point of fault, determined. The movable dial would be .numberedto' the left from 0 as far as 10 as shown in 19. A hole, as 0 1 2, is l with each figure and .is

In thelattercase, the values noes-,arr

nected'to the. adjacent bar. This provision is made so that if any or all lugs are w1thdrawn, all the resistance in t e arm or arms will be inserted, and the circuit will remain closed. In the dial form, the contact arm does not allow the circuit to become 0 en.

It will be noted in Fig. 21 that a sIidin scale is used, laced over the blocks ofeac decade, thoug only one is shown over the hundreds decade blocks. This sliding scale device consists of a trough'60 and a sliding scale 61. The trough 60 is attached by screws to plug blocks corresponding to scale numbers 0714 and an extra block. The plug blocks enumerated are conductively attached to each other by .the wire 62, and the trou h 60 is lifted above the surfaces of other p ug blocks by the interposi tion of washers 64. In using this form of rheostat, the sliding scale would be moved to the right until its zero is opposite the plug, as adjusted with battery rounded in the first operation, and the resu t, after the second balance, would be read from the movable scale. This form can be am lified to obtain the same scope as previous y described for the dial form of Fig. 19, by adding blocks and graduating the scale corres ondin ly. tii's bridge is the same as ordinarily used, many forms, having essentially the same circuits, being manu actured. However, an important difference lies in the details of the adjustable arms, and the fact that the b arm must be so arranged that the special values can be set in it.

Mechanical arrangements of bridge arms are shown in Figs. 3 and 4. In Fig. 3, the lower arm'may be 1 ohm, 10 ohms, 100 ohms or 1000 ohms by selecting the proper position of the plug the upper arms may be varied in resistance by selecting proper positions for the plugs 71 and 72, the possible resistances being 9 ohms, 9O ohms, 99 ohms, 900 ohms, 990 ohms or 999 ohms for tests by my improved process, or 1 ohm, 10 ohms, 100 ohms, or 1000 ohms for equal or decimal ratio arms for ordinary uses of the bridge.

In the bridge arms illustrated in Fig. 4

the arm formed in part of conductor a may.

be set at 1000 ohms, 100 ohms, 10 ohms, 1 ohm or 10.8 ohms as desired, by selecting the proper position for the plug 73. The arm formed in part of conductor 6 has a possible adjustment by steps of one ohm each from zero to 11,110. Thus a ratio of equality, of 1/9 or of 1/10 may be set in the arms, or bythe use of the special resistance of 10.8 ohms in the 0/ arm a further simplification of results in some cases may be attained.

A most important feature is that of the brid e-arm ratio, which by previous determination may eliminate all calculation of The basic clrcuit scheme of the resistance in ohms to the fault, which is the result desired.- It is not always necessary, however to know .the resistance in ohms to the fault, as it is frequently important to know the distance in feet or meters, if the'conductor be in a cable. In fact, the determination of the resistance to the fault is usually used as a basis of determining the distance to the fault. My invention is capable of quite as convenient use to read directly in terms of distance as in terms ofresistance, and bythe a plication of the same principles as I have a ready described.

Generally stated, the principle as applying to resistance determinations is that one bridge arm shall be to the sum of'the arms as 1 is to a power of 10..

In the case of results to be reachedin terms of distance, the principle may be stated as being thatone bridge arm shall be to the sum of the arms as 1 is'to the length per ohm of the conductor under test. Thus, in the case of feet, as 1 is to the feet per ohm of the conductor, or in the case 'of miles, as 1 is to the miles per ohm of the conductor.

To illustrate, suppose a conductor having 63 feet per ohm were under test: In making the Varley loop test as in Fig. 3, the arm a might be given a value of unity and the arm b a value of 62, equal to 63-l.

Then the formula m as I which finally expresses the result, becomes, with these values,

in which R is the resistance in ohms to the fault. If now D be taken'as the distance in feet to the fault, it is evident that D=63R, whence it follows that D=r. In other words, the adjusted value of the resistance r (or g) is equal to the distance in feet to the fault, and the instrument thus used'is direct reading.

Were the conductor under test of resistance of 63.2 feet per ohm, the bridge might be set at 1 and 62.2 respectively for the arms, or to 10 and 622 ohms, since in either r 10.8, the result will be the number of feet per ohm .ofthe wire. A foot of wire onethousandth of an inch in diameter is called I lts left-hand position toconnect the battery zero movement of the galvanometer by adjustment of the two resistances as described for'that figure, such avalue of r or g is directly given as corres onds to the distance in feet to the fault. For example, if the tests were being applied to a. faulty conductor in a cableformed of wires of #22 Brown & Sharpe gage, the faulty conductor would be looped with any good conductor at the distant-end; the area of #22 wire in circular mils being 642.8, and the milfoot resistance of cop or being 10.8, the bridge would be respectively 10.8 for a and (642.8-10.8) or 632'ohms for b.

In Figs. 1, 2, 3; 4, v and 26, B and B" are bin ing posts for the attachment of battery B; G is a post for attachment of an earth conductor; X X are posts forthe attachment of leading-in wires for the resistance to be measured or forthe conductors to be tested for fault location; K is a threeoint switch adapted whenthe lever is in termlnal B to the earth terminal G, and

when in its alternative position as shown to connect the battery terminal B" to the terminal X" of the resistance or conductor under test; D'

Fig. 19 shows the preferred form of my rotary rheostat and scale, although the form.

of Figs. 5 to 18 is usedfor Figs. 3 and 4 and is made the subject of detailed description because'of its greater simplicity.

Having thus described my invention, what I claim as new and" desire to secure by United States Letters Patent is:

1. In an electrical testing device, apparatus parts adapted by proper connection to form a Wheatstone bridge, a decimal rheostat forming a part of said apparatus and havin resistance units, ten of which are equal in resistance to one unlt of the rheostat of the next decade; a movable scale on said rheostat, and unit resistance steps in said rheostat exceeding by nine the efiective calibration of said movable scale, substantially as described.

2. In an electric testing device, a rheostat a movable scale for said rheostat numbered with scales in both directions from a is the detector or galva-.

maze-1r zero point, and having means for-retaining markers in association with one of the scales whereby a test maybe tentatively recorded, substantially as described.

3. In an electrical testing device. a rheostat havin three sets of scale divisions, one set being xed and the remaining two sets being upon an into :11 mechanical element and numbering in 0th directions from a common zero, whereby two tests recorded upon said joined scales will have the sum thereof indicated by the distance between the points of indication of the two tests,

substantially as described.

4. In anelectrical testin device, a rheostat, a set of three scales or said rheostat, two of the scales being movable with respect .to the third scale, whereby two readings may be mechanically added and recorded by. the two movable scales and the sum thereof mechanically subtracted from a third read- 5 In an electrical testing device, a current 1nd1cator; sw1tches and ratio resistances forming parts of a Wheatstone bridge; a compound rheostat forming the balancing .arm of said bridge; and a plurality of indicating scales associated with units of resistance in said com ound rheostat, whereby said bridge may b e balanced, first against one set of physical conditions and then,

using this set as a basis, against another set of physical conditions.

6. In an electrical testing device, a current indicator; switches and ratio resist- ;ances forming parts of .a -Wheatstone bridge ;'a compound rheostat forming the balancing arm of said bridge; a fixed scale and a' cooperating switch arm therefor, iadapted to record a balance of said bridge against one set of physical conditions; and

a movable scale, said switch arm cooperating therewith adapted to record a balance of -.S fl,1d bridge against another set of conditions upon the basis indicated by the first scale.

7. In an electrical testing device, a current indicator; switches and ratio resistjances forming parts of a'Wheatstone bridge; :a compound rheostat forming the-balancmg .arm of said bridge; a fixed scale and a 00- operating switch arm therefor adapted to record a balance of said bridge against one set of physical conditions; and a movable scale, said switch arm cooperating therewith physical ing which is directly readable upon the third I .or fixed scale, substantially as described.

adapted to record a balance of said bridge against another set of physical conditions upon the basis indicated by the first scale, whereby the two balances so recorded upon said joined scales will have the sum thereof indicated by the distance between the points of indication of the two balances.

8. In an electrical'testing device, a current indicator; switches and ratio resistances forming arts of a .Wheatstone bridge 5 a compoun rheostat forming the balancing arm of said bridge; a fixed scale and a cooperating switch arm therefor adapted to record a balance of said bridge against one set of physical conditions; and a pair of scales relatively mutually movable, said switch arm cofiperating therewith, each of said scales adapted to record a balance of said bridge against another set of physical conditions upon the basis indicated by a previously-used one of said scales, whereby two records may be mechanically added and recorded by the said movable scales and the sum thereof mechanically subtracted from a record which is directly readable on the said fixed scale.

Signed 1) me at Portland,county of Multnomah, an State of Ore on, in thilpresence of two witnesses, this 27 t da of a HERBERT M. Witnesses: HENRY MA'ITHEW,

M. S. FRIENDLY.

RIENDLY. 

